Previous Article
How to Remove Wooden Decking Boards: A UK DIY Guide (2026)
Over the last 12 months, we have seen a huge increase in interest for PVC decking. However, from the outset, it is key to point out that we aren’t talking about the “plastic decking” of the past.
When we discuss high-end PVC today, we are referring to Modern Ultra-Performance ASA (Acrylic-Styrene-Acrylonitrile). This is an advanced, structural engineering material—miles apart from the general, hollow plastic boards you might be picturing.
Due to this surge in quality and popularity, many of our customers are asking:
“What is the actual difference between Modern PVC and Composite?”
“Is there a clear winner?”
“Which one offers the best benefits for my specific project?”
To help you decide, we are putting these two heavyweights—Premium ASA PVC and Composite Decking—head-to-head to review their pros, cons, and performance.
| Feature | PVC Decking | Composite Decking (WPC) |
|---|---|---|
| Appearance | High-Definition & Flawless. Ultra-realistic wood grain that mimics premium interior flooring. Sleek and uniform. | Authentic & Natural. Contains real wood fibres for a matte, textured finish that captures the "rustic" feel of timber. |
| Thermal Stability | Higher expansion & contraction. Can weaken or warp in high heat. | Lower expansion & contraction. More stable in high temperatures. |
| Eco-Friendliness | Mainly made with 100% new plastic. Production can pollute. | Good. Made from reclaimed wood fibres and recycled plastics. |
| Maintenance | Effortless. Non-porous surface offers superior stain resistance (oil/grease). Simply wipe clean. | Low Maintenance. Highly durable, but the textured grain may require an occasional scrub to remove trapped pollen or debris. |
| Safety (Slip Risk) | Standard. | Excellent. Often features textured, anti-slip properties. |
| Weight | Generally the lighter material. | Varies. Hollow boards are similar in weight to PVC; solid boards are heavier. |
| Average Cost | £70 to £125 per square metre. | £33 to £92 per square metre. |
PVC decking is an outdoor flooring material that mainly contains 100% plastic, unlike composite decking, which contains a mixture of two different materials; it is made from Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) and has a synthetic appearance. Plastic decking boards come in different sizes and colours and can be used for outdoor garden flooring.
A newer product on the market today technically comes under the PVC options as PVC-ASA Decking.
These new boards boast increased UV & scratch resistance properties and are effortless to maintain, but they do have a price tag and some other drawbacks, which we will review later in this article.
Wood-Plastic Composite (WPC) is produced by mixing reclaimed wood fibres and recycled plastics. During production, composite decking undergoes a heating and bonding process, which is cooled to form composite decking boards. These are available in various sizes and colours.
The recycled plastics come from waste shampoo & detergent bottles, including plastic bags and bucket; the quality and quantity of plastic or wood used depends on the brand of choice. Many composite manufacturers use lower-quality recycled plastics (LDPE) and wood fibres to reduce production and manufacturing costs. This is the key reason why superior quality composite decking boards are more expensive than others.
Now that you are aware of what WPC and PVC decking is, it is time to compare them. In this next segment, we will be reviewing the properties of the two types of decking, allowing us to reach a conclusion on which board is better.
Composite decking boards can be customised to look and feel like real wood during the manufacturing process. Homeowners who have used wood decking before, can tell that composite decking offers a similar texture to that of natural wood.
Plastic or PVC decking has an engineered synthetic surface, which is the key difference when compared to composite decking. After comparing the surface texture of both materials, we can conclude that composite decking’s surface offers an improved natural wood feel and appearance to that of PVC decking.
Like any product, composite and PVC decking are consistently being improved, the recent manufacturing changes in PVC are using an ASA top layer that provides an improved wood grain appearance that is like indoor flooring. Composite decking on the other hand, uses mixed colours that truly captures the exotic wood look, the feel and visual appearance of composite decking – becoming more natural imitation of wood.
Expert View: PVC-ASA decking has taken a leap forward on authenticity, providing a more natural wood grain and colour than ever before. At the same time, the new mixed-colour composite decking is truly starting to capture the natural blend of shades seen in exotic hardwoods.
Composite Decking is generally considered the more “authentic” choice. Because the core contains real reclaimed wood fibres, the boards have a natural matte finish and a texture that feels warm and organic to the touch. If you want your deck to look and feel like traditional timber—imperfections and all—Composite is the winner.
ASA PVC Decking, on the other hand, offers a “High-Definition” finish. The wood grain is incredibly sharp and detailed, similar to high-end indoor laminate flooring. It offers a sleek, flawless, and uniform look that is perfect for ultra-modern homes, but some homeowners find it lacks the “rustic charm” of a wood-blend board.
Expert View: In my opinion, the most advanced PVC decking aims for a flawless, smooth finish. But true wood isn’t flawless; it’s raw, rustic, and textured. That “imperfection” character is what I find composite decking captures so effectively.
Both WPC and PVC decking are famously easy to maintain and do not require the painting, sanding, or sealing that wooden decking does. However, due to their surface differences, they clean up slightly differently.
Composite Decking is stain resistant, but because it has a textured grain, pollen and dirt can sometimes sit in the grooves. It usually requires a scrub with a stiff brush and hot soapy water to keep it looking its best.
PVC / ASA Decking, on the other hand, is non-porous. Spills like wine, oil, or grease tend to sit on the surface rather than soaking in, meaning they can often be wiped away with a cloth without the need for scrubbing.
Expert View: For general low maintenance, Capped Composite and PVC are in a dead heat. The difference emerges when you factor in scratch resistance. In my experience, premium PVC provides a tougher surface that better resists scuffs and scrapes. It’s the more resilient choice, but this added performance comes at a premium.
When it comes to thermal stability, composites are better. Independent testing shows that PVC has a higher linear thermal expansion coefficient, making it more susceptible to high temperatures which can cause it to expand more and potentially weaken over time.
Expert View: Why do we mention expansion? Because consistent, significant expansion and contraction from heat can weaken a material over many seasons. Based on the data, composite decking’s lower thermal expansion gives it a clear advantage in stability, which can contribute to a longer potential lifespan.
When it comes to choosing a decking area, a priority for many is how environmentally friendly the material is. In this regard, both PVC and composites are becoming more environmentally friendly as manufacturers strive to use better materials.
When reviewing how environmentally friendly anything is, it is important to consider recyclability, longevity and production; in this regard, composite outperforms PVC.
Composites are a mixture of wood and plastic. While separating hybrid materials has been difficult in the past, the industry is making rapid progress with specialised equipment to separate it into its base components. PVC, on the other hand, is an all-plastic material that typically relies on virgin polymers. While durable, PVC presents specific challenges when being recycled. Due to its complex chemical composition, it is much harder to process responsibly at the end of its life compared to other plastics.
Expert View: We’re seeing more customers than ever prioritise the environmental impact of their purchase, and for good reason. From an eco-perspective, the two materials are quite different. PVC is a plastic that faces significant challenges when being recycled. In contrast, composite decking’s core components are reclaimed wood fibres and recycled plastics (like HDPE), which makes it the clear eco-friendlier choice in my view.
Solid composite boards are heavier than PVC decking boards and the former, (solid composites) will require a stronger frame to support the added weight. This means more materials are required to build the subframe and joist centres will need to be placed closer together. However, some manufacturers offer hollow composites, which are significantly lighter. Hollow composites are similar in weight to PVC decking; but generally, PVC is the lighter material of the two.
Expert View: In our experience, the weight of a decking board matters for two practical reasons: installation and logistics. First, lighter boards are simply easier and faster for a professional or DIYer to handle on site. Second, from a logistics standpoint, lighter materials often mean a more cost-effective delivery. On both of these points, PVC’s significantly lighter weight gives it a clear advantage.
When it comes to how decking reacts to heat, there are two factors to consider: surface temperature (how hot it feels) and thermal stability (how much it expands).
In our own internal tests on a 27°C day here in the UK, we found no significant difference in the surface temperature of composite versus PVC. In all honesty, both materials will get hot in direct sunlight.
The more important long-term factor is thermal stability. Independent testing shows that PVC has a higher linear thermal expansion coefficient (average 70-80 × 10⁻⁶/K) compared to composite (average 33-46 × 10⁻⁶/K). This means PVC is more susceptible to heat and will expand and contract more significantly.
Expert View: Why do we mention expansion? Because consistent, significant expansion and contraction from heat can weaken a material over many seasons, sometimes leading to issues like warping. Based on the data, composite decking’s lower thermal expansion gives it a clear advantage in stability, which can contribute to a longer potential lifespan for your deck.
Safety is an important consideration when looking to purchase decking; some boards are safer than others. One of the fundamental issues with wood and other types of decking is slipping. Composite decking has anti-slip properties, making a much better choice over PVC decking and wood, especially when wet.
Furthermore, many brands of composite decking boards feature a wood-like grain. A woodgrain texture not only adds to the appearance but also adds to its safety. Please note – surface treatment after production makes a huge difference on slip and scratch performance with woodgrain composite boards.
Wood grains on certain brands of composites produce friction thereby, reducing smoothness. Boards that have an embossed (pressed wood grain) surface finish are safer and the boards have more texture, thus creating more friction, and reducing the chance that you will slip on your decking.
If you are building a decking area which has a high-risk of getting wet, then composite decking is probably the best and safest option for you. Safety may be one of your biggest concerns when it comes to decking, and this is understandable. If this is the case, composite decking is an ideal choice.
Expert View: To be honest, both are good options for slip resistance. Most of our data on high-end PVC comes from our cousins in the US market. However, when we look at what we actually install day-to-day here in the UK, composite decking feels more secure underfoot. It simply has a rougher, more defined texture, and that means more grip when the deck gets wet.
Many homeowners want the best value for money without compromising on quality. PVC decking is generally more expensive than composite, ranging from £70 to £125 per square metre, whereas composite is typically £33 to £92 per square metre. If you are on a budget but still want a great quality board, composite decking is the best option.
Expert View on Value: Both materials are a good investment with long-term benefits over wood. For me, the choice comes down to value. While high-end PVC offers superior scratch resistance, it comes at a premium price. Composite decking, however, delivers a more authentic wood aesthetic and better thermal stability at a more accessible price point. For the best all-around package of performance and price, composite gets the edge.
Both PVC and composite are excellent, durable, low-maintenance alternatives to wood. The right choice depends on your specific project and priorities.
Plastic (PVC) decking’s main weakness is its susceptibility to high temperatures, which can cause it to expand and weaken over time. Composites hold their shape and strength better. Arguably, the natural aesthetic of composite decking also makes it more advantageous.
While both are excellent, we have found that the majority of homeowners want a beautiful, durable, and relatively affordable decking solution. If this is you, then we recommend composite decking, as it ticks all of these boxes.
Previous Article
How to Remove Wooden Decking Boards: A UK DIY Guide (2026)
Can You Put a Rug on Composite Decking? A UK Safety Guide (2026)